“A bold rich smoky nose is created naturally with a blend of smoked malts from Bamberg, Germany and Chilton, Wisconsin as well as robust Wisconsin Rye. Special Ale yeast ferments this hazy deep amber brew in the bottle. This is a big smoked beer fermented with Turbinado sugar and appropriate for sipping slowly today.”
New Glarus Unplugged Smoked Rye Ale
Smoked Beer, 8.5% ABV
Sayeth the Guys:
RYAN: You may notice that we have categorized this as a “Cellared Beer Review” and tagged it as a “Cellar Review.” And if you didn’t notice, well, now you know. Normally I would protest cellaring a smoked beer because I’d expect the smokiness to simply fade off leaving much of nothing behind. But I thought, with the addition of the Ale yeast and the sugar used in the brew, it might be worth the experiment.
Poured fresh and in to a barleywine glass, the smoked rye ale appears water thin and a deep mahogany in color – but also nearly translucent.
The nose screams barbecue; smoke, bacon and charcoal – all are borderline overpowering. Trying to push past it, rather unsuccessfully, is a bit of Belgian candied sugar.
As for the flavors, they can best be described using just four words:
“smoke, sugar, warm, sweet”
The smokiness comes through first followed by a sweetness from the sugar that carries through to the rather dry finish. The 8.5% ABV makes it nice and warming, although not overly boozy. And, despite its thin appearance, this beer does have a bit of heft to it.
Allow this beer to warm a bit and you’ll find the smoke drifts off leaving a clean scent and a sweet beer with just traces of smoke in the finish.
While there wasn’t an overabundance of flavors the ones that were present were a tad overbearing, which is why I am glad we set a few bottles aside to see how this develops over the next few years. This could turn in to a total bust or a cellaring stroke of genius. I guess only time will tell.
1 YEAR
Karl: I’ll start by saying this – I smoked cigarettes for a quite a long time, and quit about 4 years ago. Since that time, I can’t remember having anything as smoky as this beer. Not barbecue, not beef jerky, hell, this might even beat out my pipe.
Smoky, smoky, smoky, this beer is a campfire in a bottle, hearty and rich like a smooth cigar, it’s also simultaneously red-meat savory and I even swore I caught a tiny hint of some nice, aged sharp cheddar. No shit, cheddar. Search this site and see if you find any other references to cheese, period. It’s crazy. But it works.
Beyond the smoke flavor there’s a sparkly brightness behind the fire here, like a barrel of harvest ale left next to the smokehouse for a little while. Like nothing else (and it’s shocking how often we get to say that about New Glarus beers), this is definitely one to pleasantly puzzle your palate with some new things you might not have thought beer could do.
Ryan: This is one of the more confounding cellared beers we’ve sampled, which is saying a lot because we’ve had some funky cellared beers.
Fresh, this is a sweet and warming beer whose smoky aroma is more bark than bite. Give it a year and whoo boy.
That delicate sweetness that was present in a fresh pour of the smoked rye ale is long gone. It’s still there, sort of, but much tougher to find – buried below layer upon layer of wood chips, mesquite barbecue sauce, charcoal and burnt bacon.
The smokiness of this beer is borderline overpowering, which is exactly what I didn’t expect after one year in the cellar. I imagined, after a year to rest, the smoke would back off even more and the Belgian candied sugar would shine. Nope. Not even close.
The body is still a tad watery, but not in an unappealing way, and the alcohol is still well hidden.
At this stage, I would put this up against any Rauchbier and it would certainly hold its own. Makes one wonder what year two has in store for the smoked rye?











What would you say is a good way to describe a cellared beer, anyway? I kind of like the concept but I am not sure how to categorize it, or does it not really matter? Can even session lagers be cellared, in other words?
Also, while I am at it, is it cellared beers that are used when doing a vertical tasting?
Thanks, guys.
Hi Rick!
I would describe a “cellared beer” as a beer that you deliberately set aside to see how it would taste after one year, two years, etc of aging time.
This can be done because you have read on BA or Rate Beer that a particular beer tastes better after it has sat around for a year or two. Or, because you are just curious what a beer would taste like beyond what most people would consider fresh. We are doing a little bit of both. We have traditional styles (imperial stouts and barleywines) that we are aging because – traditionally – these beers age well. We are also aging some double IPA’s and even a plain-old stout to see how they develop over time. The latter is kind of an experiment. Most people would cringe at the thought of not drinking a double IPA fresh but that is the fun of cellaring – it’s your beer and you can do whatever you want with it. That being said, I am not sure if a lager would be a great candidate for the cellar simply because of the low ABV. But, if you want to give it a shot, go for it – and report back how it turned out.
It’s funny you mention vertical’s – we’re actually working up a post on that very same subject for next week. As a bit of a preview we can tell you beers like Sierra Nevada Celebration, Anchor Christmas or Brooklyn Black Chocolate Stout are great candidates for verticals. Essentially, anything that is fairly high in ABV and is readily available each year should be on your radar. The only catch is you have to be patient, especially if you are building up 10 or 20 year verticals. And, yes, we do have a few of those up our sleeve.
Great to see the Guys are still drinking beer! Per Karl’s comment…if he thinks this beer is smoky…he outta get into a bottle of Schlenkerla Urbock. I can barley finish half a bottle! Liquid jerky.